RaTTuS wrote:download H2testw 1.4 and run that over it [on a windows machine]
that will tell you if it is fake or not
I ran H2testw and here are the results:
Warning: Only 63975 of 63976 MByte tested.
The media is likely to be defective.
3.7 GByte OK (7939867 sectors)
58.6 GByte DATA LOST (123080933 sectors)
Details:0 KByte overwritten (0 sectors)
0 KByte slightly changed (< 8 bit/sector, 0 sectors)
58.6 GByte corrupted (123080933 sectors)
0 KByte aliased memory (0 sectors)
First error at offset: 0x00000000f24e3600
Expected: 0x00000000f24e3600
Found: 0x2268a0b9e01e8574
H2testw version 1.3
Writing speed: 7.07 MByte/s
Reading speed: 16.2 MByte/s
H2testw v1.4
AndrewS wrote:Uh, what?

Never heard of that. The recommended (and supported) version of Raspbian is available from
http://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/ so use that to test your hardware, and if it works you can then use whatever other weird and wonderful distros you like

I re-checked the file format on the SD and it turns out it was exFat. I reformatted it to FAT32 and installed Raspbian. I was unable to get it to display on any tv or monitor.
What I don't understand is; if the SD cards a fake, why am I able to save files from my pc onto it? They both work fine for that purpose.
drgeoff wrote:The image file contained in that Ghoulmann download is dated November 2012. 18 months too old to work on a B+.
And what sensible person writes an instructable which tells you to download a .tar.gz file, extract it and write it with Win32DiskImager? (No guidance whatsoever given on how to do that extraction on a Windows PC.)
I agree. The instructions were quite lacking. I was a bit hesitant on installing such a dated OS but based on the review comments, people still seemed pretty happy with how it functioned so I figured I'd give it a try.