Would selling Arm to Softbank be a disaster for the UK?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36822806
Already changed to "ARM chip designer". Almost every media outlet, including those who should know better, are headlining "chipmaker" so I guess that's what came over the wire from the agencies.PeterO wrote:BBC news's headline writers get it wrong as usual
"ARM chipmaker to be bought"
No doubt.Analysts speculate that they plan to enhance the licence fees for ARM chips
Nah. Apple has already shown how to turn it's products around from 6502, to 68000, to Power PC, to Intel and to ARM.We can only hope that some big players like Apple can prevent the deal.
Quite so...jamesh wrote:Blimey, such negativity on so little (or indeed, no) evidence.
How did you work that out?gkreidl wrote:...they have to pay 30% less than two weeks ago...
Currency exchange value between Japanese Yen and UK Sterling (according to German magazine Spiegel online).asandford wrote:How did you work that out?gkreidl wrote:...they have to pay 30% less than two weeks ago...
Over the last month, the rate has gone from a high of ~160 and a low of ~130, which is about 20%, but today is 141 - so ~12%gkreidl wrote: ...they have to pay 30% less than two weeks ago....
Thanks James, but I think it would be more interesting to hear your views on the thread subject.jamesh wrote:Blimey, such negativity...
Hugely in debt, and not an R&D business. Some cause for concern perhaps.Burngate wrote:At 1,742.85p each, even a couple'd be nice!
Apparently "Softbank is currently in debt to the tune of around $100bn" so $32 bn could be considered small change?
Just supposing it is terrible, why would Apple be a better buyer? Wouldn't that hurt Arm business with all those Apple competitors?gkreidl wrote:This is terrible...
We can only hope that some big players like Apple can prevent the deal.
A company loosing money every day and which has no interest in chip design at all will buy ARM only for one reason; to get their hands on the license fees.PiGraham wrote:Just supposing it is terrible, why would Apple be a better buyer? Wouldn't that hurt Arm business with all those Apple competitors?gkreidl wrote:This is terrible...
We can only hope that some big players like Apple can prevent the deal.
Yes a joint venture between Acorn Computers, Apple & VLSI Technology. The Apple Newton powered by ARM !!gkreidl wrote: BTW, Apple was one of the first investors into ARM in the early nineties.
If ARM was important to Apple they would have done so, likewise if ARM was important to the UK the UK would have done so. I'm not sure what is meant to be lost by someone else owning the IP. Aren't patents traded every day?gkreidl wrote:A company loosing money every day and which has no interest in chip design at all will buy ARM only for one reason; to get their hands on the license fees.PiGraham wrote:Just supposing it is terrible, why would Apple be a better buyer? Wouldn't that hurt Arm business with all those Apple competitors?gkreidl wrote:This is terrible...
We can only hope that some big players like Apple can prevent the deal.
Best thing would be, if ARM remains independent. But some of the big players who need the ARM technology like Apple or Samsung could buy a decent percentage of shares to protect ARM.
BTW, Apple was one of the first investors into ARM in the early nineties.
By a Japanese company.SteveDee wrote:...
Is there such a thing as National Prestige? Do companies like Arm and products like the Raspberry Pi inspire young people? Does it matter that the Raspberry Pi is manufactured in Wales rather than China?