User avatar
ric96
Posts: 1253
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:03 am
Location: NOIDA, India
Contact: Website

over complicated windows installation!!

Sat Jan 24, 2015 8:13 pm

Now i have installed a lot of linux based os but i decided to give windows 10 a spin --ps. Not a very good decision.
What I was surprised at was that how many times it rebooted, after every freakin step it need to reboot !!!
Linux copies the files and reboots Done! But windows... Ufff.!!
Whats the reasin that linux does it so simply and windows has to reboot many times???
My apologies for shameless YouTube Plugs...
youtube.com/sahajsarup
twitter @sahajsarup
skype srics1996
e-mail: sahajsarup@gmail.com
Blog: http://www.geektillithertz.com/wordpress
Web: http://www.geektillithertz.com

dan3008
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 1:05 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 11:16 am

I've just installed both windows 7 and ubuntu (with LXDE, not that bloat-ware unity) on my new desktop and found the same, it reboots a lot (once in ubuntu install at the end, 4 times during the windoze 7)

the only thing I can see that causes it is that windows seems to install parts of itself, reboot to sort out its registaries and what not, and then use the bits its installed to install the next bit???

I did once email M$ support line, when I was doing a job for a not for profit setting up and installing their computers, and had to install XP on 10 bare bones systems... and M$'s reply "if you dont like the install process, buy a computer with it already installed" ... really?
dan3008 wrote:Pays your money, takes your choice

fruitoftheloom
Posts: 21068
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:40 pm
Location: Delightful Dorset

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 11:28 am

Windows 7 and later auto rebooting during install is a feature nothing more nothing less.

That is the trouble of keep adding bloatware to a late 1980's Operating System which was flawed after the split from IBM's OS/2.....

Whatever way M$ paint it up the NT Kernel is not flexible enough to span various devices.

Steve Jobs got it right with NextStep/OS X which is has its roots in Unix

Linus T also got it right which again has its root in Unix
Retired disgracefully.....
This at present is my daily "computer" https://www.asus.com/us/Chrome-Devices/Chromebit-CS10/

Joe Schmoe
Posts: 4277
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:11 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 11:50 am

fruitoftheloom wrote:Windows 7 and later auto rebooting during install is a feature nothing more nothing less.

That is the trouble of keep adding bloatware to a late 1980's Operating System which was flawed after the split from IBM's OS/2.....

Whatever way M$ paint it up the NT Kernel is not flexible enough to span various devices.

Steve Jobs got it right with NextStep/OS X which is has its roots in Unix

Linus T also got it right which again has its root in Unix
While I don't disagree with the gist of this post, the fact is that MS has a different objective/operating-constraints-set than either OSX or Linux. That is, it has to be end-user installable (although it almost certainly won't be, in practice) and it has to work 100% of the time (or as close to that as is humanly possible).

What this boils down to is that it doesn't bother me at all if the install (of Windows) has to reboot several times, if that ensures that it will always work. Linux can get away with a "Only reboot at the end" model, because:
  1. It is better architected. No argument there.
  2. If it fails, the user is assumed to be agile enough to fix it.
P.S. Re: OSX. As far as I can tell, OSX is *never* end-user installed raw. And by "raw", I mean on a machine that isn't running any OS. In comparison, Windows, although almost always sold pre-installed, is sometimes/frequently installed raw (by an end-user).
And some folks need to stop being fanboys and see the forest behind the trees.

(One of the best lines I've seen on this board lately)

fruitoftheloom
Posts: 21068
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:40 pm
Location: Delightful Dorset

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 12:47 pm

Joe Schmoe wrote: P.S. Re: OSX. As far as I can tell, OSX is *never* end-user installed raw. And by "raw", I mean on a machine that isn't running any OS. In comparison, Windows, although almost always sold pre-installed, is sometimes/frequently installed raw (by an end-user).
OS X 10.6.x was sold as a Retail DVD and afaiaa it was the last version available

http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MC573 ... ow-leopard

I have installed Retail PPC versions of OSX on several machines, but never a Intel version as yet !
Retired disgracefully.....
This at present is my daily "computer" https://www.asus.com/us/Chrome-Devices/Chromebit-CS10/

Joe Schmoe
Posts: 4277
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:11 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 12:53 pm

You missed the key word "raw" in my text.
And some folks need to stop being fanboys and see the forest behind the trees.

(One of the best lines I've seen on this board lately)

fruitoftheloom
Posts: 21068
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:40 pm
Location: Delightful Dorset

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 1:47 pm

Joe Schmoe wrote:You missed the key word "raw" in my text.
Not at all, Retail OSX is a bootable DVD and installs on a drive which has no partitions or operating system whatsoever, the
DVD has the required formatting tools included, providing the system requirements are met of course ;)
Retired disgracefully.....
This at present is my daily "computer" https://www.asus.com/us/Chrome-Devices/Chromebit-CS10/

jamesh
Raspberry Pi Engineer & Forum Moderator
Raspberry Pi Engineer & Forum Moderator
Posts: 24138
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:41 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 2:09 pm

fruitoftheloom wrote:Windows 7 and later auto rebooting during install is a feature nothing more nothing less.

That is the trouble of keep adding bloatware to a late 1980's Operating System which was flawed after the split from IBM's OS/2.....

Whatever way M$ paint it up the NT Kernel is not flexible enough to span various devices.

Steve Jobs got it right with NextStep/OS X which is has its roots in Unix

Linus T also got it right which again has its root in Unix
The original NT worked on Intel, Alpha, Power PC and MIPS. I used a twin core alpha based device that was very speedy for the time.

So is was, at some point, capable of 'spanning' multiple devices, if that is what you were getting at. I think it probably would, had the need been there, be fairly easily made to work to the present day on those architectures.
Principal Software Engineer at Raspberry Pi (Trading) Ltd.
Contrary to popular belief, humorous signatures are allowed. Here's an example...
“I think it’s wrong that only one company makes the game Monopoly.” – Steven Wright

fruitoftheloom
Posts: 21068
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:40 pm
Location: Delightful Dorset

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 2:39 pm

jamesh wrote:
fruitoftheloom wrote:Windows 7 and later auto rebooting during install is a feature nothing more nothing less.

That is the trouble of keep adding bloatware to a late 1980's Operating System which was flawed after the split from IBM's OS/2.....

Whatever way M$ paint it up the NT Kernel is not flexible enough to span various devices.

Steve Jobs got it right with NextStep/OS X which is has its roots in Unix

Linus T also got it right which again has its root in Unix
The original NT worked on Intel, Alpha, Power PC and MIPS. I used a twin core alpha based device that was very speedy for the time.

So is was, at some point, capable of 'spanning' multiple devices, if that is what you were getting at. I think it probably would, had the need been there, be fairly easily made to work to the present day on those architectures.
Yes but from Kernel NT5 they change quite considerably, afaiaa the NT4 and earlier was still more "IBM" than M$, also M$ developed a seperate OS for "hand held" in the late 90's so did not see multi-arch as a feature of NT :!:

Though to get back to the original question, most people just accept Windows as the defacto whatever its foibles
Retired disgracefully.....
This at present is my daily "computer" https://www.asus.com/us/Chrome-Devices/Chromebit-CS10/

hippy
Posts: 6233
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: UK

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 2:43 pm

Given how rarely one would normally install an OS a few re-boots isn't a lot to worry over in the scheme of things.

I installed a USB-to-VGA display link adapter on my XP machine last week. Ran the driver installer, plugged the adapter in, and it worked as expected. Two minutes work and not even a re-boot needed.

To use it on a Pi it appears I have to rebuild the kernel.

jamesh
Raspberry Pi Engineer & Forum Moderator
Raspberry Pi Engineer & Forum Moderator
Posts: 24138
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:41 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:37 pm

fruitoftheloom wrote:
jamesh wrote:
fruitoftheloom wrote:Windows 7 and later auto rebooting during install is a feature nothing more nothing less.

That is the trouble of keep adding bloatware to a late 1980's Operating System which was flawed after the split from IBM's OS/2.....

Whatever way M$ paint it up the NT Kernel is not flexible enough to span various devices.

Steve Jobs got it right with NextStep/OS X which is has its roots in Unix

Linus T also got it right which again has its root in Unix
The original NT worked on Intel, Alpha, Power PC and MIPS. I used a twin core alpha based device that was very speedy for the time.

So is was, at some point, capable of 'spanning' multiple devices, if that is what you were getting at. I think it probably would, had the need been there, be fairly easily made to work to the present day on those architectures.
Yes but from Kernel NT5 they change quite considerably, afaiaa the NT4 and earlier was still more "IBM" than M$, also M$ developed a seperate OS for "hand held" in the late 90's so did not see multi-arch as a feature of NT :!:

Though to get back to the original question, most people just accept Windows as the defacto whatever its foibles
Wasn't NT4 more VMS than IBM as the the architect came from DEC (WNT being VMS + 1)
Principal Software Engineer at Raspberry Pi (Trading) Ltd.
Contrary to popular belief, humorous signatures are allowed. Here's an example...
“I think it’s wrong that only one company makes the game Monopoly.” – Steven Wright

User avatar
scruss
Posts: 2617
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:25 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact: Website

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 7:11 pm

jamesh wrote:Wasn't NT4 more VMS than IBM as the the architect came from DEC (WNT being VMS + 1)
It has some similarities to VMS. When you get down to low-level command line admin tools it can feel very VMS-like with its COMMAND VERB/OPTION/OPTION … syntax.

VMS was pretty decent, and was extremely good at managing devices. I miss its file versioning, although it was far too easy to fill up a folder with old versions.
‘Remember the Golden Rule of Selling: “Do not resort to violence.”’ — McGlashan.

ShiftPlusOne
Raspberry Pi Engineer & Forum Moderator
Raspberry Pi Engineer & Forum Moderator
Posts: 6075
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:36 pm
Location: The unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 7:37 pm

The reboots don't really bother me. What annoys me the most are the updates and default settings. You don't get all the updates at once, you first need to upgrade windows update, reboot, update .net framework (or something like that), reboot, update a few more packages, reboot, then it will download and install a service pack, reboot.... you get the idea. It renders the PC unusable for the whole day as most of it will be spent on the "windows is configuring update 5 of 9001" screen. There are cases where interrupting the updates or not doing all of the updates before installing all your software will result in things being broken in subtle and annoying ways. Okay, once everything is installed I'll need to make it show file extensions, add the my computer icon, change the start menu to 'classic' style, disable taskbar grouping and make it use the small icons with text. Then launch internet explorer to download a sensible browser and find that there's an annoying configuration thing that pops up. Oh, then there are the drivers... things that can't be found using windows update end up requiring you to go to the manufacturer website and figure out if you have the model 3939478 rev 1.0 A or 3939478 rev 1.0 B to download the correct driver. This is extra fun when the driver is for the NIC because you may end up having to use another computer to download the drivers and then transfer them using a usb drive or something. Maybe 2 days later you have everything you need installed and you're ready to start using it properly.

The most frustrating recent linux install I had was when using a GTX970 graphics card. I found that I wouldn't get any output on the screen at all and had to download a beta driver from the nvidia website, switch to the on-board GPU, install the driver and then switch back to the new GPU. That took about an hour from start to finish with all of the necessary software and updates installed.

</rant>

marked
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:25 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Sun Jan 25, 2015 9:32 pm

Installed 10 preview earlier this month, for which i think I spent about 5 minutes shepherding answering questions about locale and network, and then really didn't care about what happened for reboots, because really, what does it matter? If you are doing an update on a production system then it should be out of service for however long it takes. Or it is replaced with a complete new build with migration.

I admit that pretty much of my day to day is browser based so I can knock over a box and be back up and running within a couple of minutes especially if I am using Chrome, so even this morning's update to the latest 10 wasn't too painful apart from the really annoying stupid AMD graphics drivers which insist on scaling an HDMI screen to 95% or something - despite the display being perfectly fine beforehand. ....

dan3008
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 1:05 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:22 am

Probably not overly relevant to the restart annoyance, but the windows 7 install, on a 1TB disk partition, left my disk over 5% fragmented according to defraggler anyway.

Whereas an ubuntu install, was less than 1%

Just intresting stats for you
dan3008 wrote:Pays your money, takes your choice

User avatar
mrpi64
Posts: 931
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:13 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:04 am

Isn't windows 10 still in development? I think you can download and try it out somewhere on Microsoft's website.
EDIT: maybe this? http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/preview-iso
I'm happy to help.
https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=78&t=51794 - List of games that work on the Pi.

fruitoftheloom
Posts: 21068
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:40 pm
Location: Delightful Dorset

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:08 am

mrpi64 wrote:Isn't windows 10 still in development? I think you can download and try it out somewhere on Microsoft's website.
EDIT: maybe this? http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/preview-iso
Yep one has to sign up to become a member of the Windows Insider Program, fortunately I am a MSRP ;)
Retired disgracefully.....
This at present is my daily "computer" https://www.asus.com/us/Chrome-Devices/Chromebit-CS10/

User avatar
ric96
Posts: 1253
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:03 am
Location: NOIDA, India
Contact: Website

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:11 am

Yeah I am running a preview build.
My apologies for shameless YouTube Plugs...
youtube.com/sahajsarup
twitter @sahajsarup
skype srics1996
e-mail: sahajsarup@gmail.com
Blog: http://www.geektillithertz.com/wordpress
Web: http://www.geektillithertz.com

User avatar
Jednorozec
Posts: 809
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 2:17 pm
Location: Deposit, NY

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:35 am

Joe Schmoe wrote:....the fact is that MS has a different objective/operating-constraints-set than either OSX or Linux. That is, it has to be end-user installable (although it almost certainly won't be, in practice) and it has to work 100% of the time (or as close to that as is humanly possible).
If you have a version of Windows that works close to 100% of the time then you're living in a different universe than I am.
The most important leg of a three legged stool is the one that's missing.
It's called thinking. Why don't you try it sometime?

Joe Schmoe
Posts: 4277
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:11 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:55 am

Jednorozec wrote:
Joe Schmoe wrote:....the fact is that MS has a different objective/operating-constraints-set than either OSX or Linux. That is, it has to be end-user installable (although it almost certainly won't be, in practice) and it has to work 100% of the time (or as close to that as is humanly possible).
If you have a version of Windows that works close to 100% of the time then you're living in a different universe than I am.
(Ob snark)

I live in the real world. Where do you live?
And some folks need to stop being fanboys and see the forest behind the trees.

(One of the best lines I've seen on this board lately)

User avatar
cyrano
Posts: 714
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:48 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:28 am

Joe Schmoe wrote:P.S. Re: OSX. As far as I can tell, OSX is *never* end-user installed raw. And by "raw", I mean on a machine that isn't running any OS.
Depends on the user. Some change their own harddisk/SSD when replacing or upgrading. But since it is also very easy to install on any other bootable medium (external harddisk, USB stick, ipod...) lots of people do "raw" installs.

And if you like optical media, you can create bootable DVD's too. Nobody does, of course, bur it is possible.

Joe Schmoe
Posts: 4277
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:11 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:47 pm

It depends on your definition of "raw".

It seems I am using a different definition than are some of the people here who are attempting to negative my claims.

It is OK. One thing that is certainly true of the modern world - is that everyone is entitled to their own set of definitions.

And their own facts…
And some folks need to stop being fanboys and see the forest behind the trees.

(One of the best lines I've seen on this board lately)

jamesh
Raspberry Pi Engineer & Forum Moderator
Raspberry Pi Engineer & Forum Moderator
Posts: 24138
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:41 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:53 pm

Jednorozec wrote:
Joe Schmoe wrote:....the fact is that MS has a different objective/operating-constraints-set than either OSX or Linux. That is, it has to be end-user installable (although it almost certainly won't be, in practice) and it has to work 100% of the time (or as close to that as is humanly possible).
If you have a version of Windows that works close to 100% of the time then you're living in a different universe than I am.
Hmm, the only problems I have with my Win7 Lenovo laptop, apart from a really dire wireless adapter (thanks Intel), is it occasionally fails to hibernate properly.Otherwise it's pretty robust. My Ubuntu box dies more often - dodgy graphics driver I suspect.

Still prefer Linux.
Principal Software Engineer at Raspberry Pi (Trading) Ltd.
Contrary to popular belief, humorous signatures are allowed. Here's an example...
“I think it’s wrong that only one company makes the game Monopoly.” – Steven Wright

User avatar
ric96
Posts: 1253
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:03 am
Location: NOIDA, India
Contact: Website

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:51 pm

Update:
So i decided to revert to windows 7 by doing a fresh install and i actually only restarts twice, less that 8 or 10 but still unnecessary.
My apologies for shameless YouTube Plugs...
youtube.com/sahajsarup
twitter @sahajsarup
skype srics1996
e-mail: sahajsarup@gmail.com
Blog: http://www.geektillithertz.com/wordpress
Web: http://www.geektillithertz.com

User avatar
mrpi64
Posts: 931
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:13 pm

Re: over complicated windows installation!!

Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:33 am

jamesh wrote:
Jednorozec wrote:
Joe Schmoe wrote:....the fact is that MS has a different objective/operating-constraints-set than either OSX or Linux. That is, it has to be end-user installable (although it almost certainly won't be, in practice) and it has to work 100% of the time (or as close to that as is humanly possible).
If you have a version of Windows that works close to 100% of the time then you're living in a different universe than I am.
Hmm, the only problems I have with my Win7 Lenovo laptop, apart from a really dire wireless adapter (thanks Intel), is it occasionally fails to hibernate properly.Otherwise it's pretty robust. My Ubuntu box dies more often - dodgy graphics driver I suspect.

Still prefer Linux.
Me too. Win10 keeps on waking itself up from hibernation and sleep, and every time Ubuntu goes into suspend, if something is reading/writing to a file, it sets the filesystem to read-only, which is really annoying and takes 3 reboots to fix.
I'm happy to help.
https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=78&t=51794 - List of games that work on the Pi.

Return to “Off topic discussion”